Marie Antoinette, Serial Killer by Katie Alender: I'm a fool of a Took guys . . .
Marie Antoinette, Serial Killer
by
Katie Alender
Why did I think this book was a good idea? Look at the cover! Look at the Title! Despite the title and fairly horrendous cover I picked it up anyway. Because I am a fool of a Took.
The
blurb promised crooked Parisian streets, and food, and a murderous ghost, so .
. . I figured it was at least worth a try? For the ghosts at least. I mean a Parisian
romp with a dead serial killer who chops off people’s heads. What’s not to
love?
Everything. I guess I kind of got what I expected.
The Characters
Colette
If I had to spend one more second with this protagonist I think I would have
beheaded her myself. It’s blunt and frankly a terrible thing to say but true.
Colette was a brat. Look I am all for having characters that are outside of the
‘oh no I’m so socially outcast and alone’ norm but just . . . not like this.
Can we have just one character that is popular because they’re actually nice?
Anyway Colette was a broke girl trying to pretend to be rich and fabulous so
she can fit in with her equally rich and fabulous friends. And breaking her
mom’s back with a trip to Paris without so much as a thank you. Her job was to
be a complete jerk and then moan in her head ‘but I don’t want to be this way’
or ‘but on the inside I’m okay’
well about you act like it lady instead of just
saying it? Colette and I were not friends.
Jules
I don’t know if I actually
like Jules or if I’m just really glad it wasn’t the somehow even more cliché model
guy.
Jules was a tour guide, for some
reason or another, and he ends up dating/courting/Who-Knows Colette, again for
some reason or another. I didn’t necessarily like him but I didn’t despise him
like I did Colette so at least he’s got that going for him.
Armand
Colette! You know there is
a serial killer wandering around Paris okay. You know what’s not a good idea?
Chatting up the dude that you literally met in a back alleyway, alone, in the
dark.
Do you have a death wish!?
Anyway Armand was a sleaze-bag, everybody
could see it except for Colette. On a side note what is it with describing dudes as a lion?
‘Scuse you sir Aslan had wonderful eyes and a ‘luscious mane’ way before you.
Audrey
I’d say that she was here
as a juxtaposition to Colette or maybe Colette’s friends but I don’t think I could
justify the use of such a complicated word. Audrey didn’t care about everything
Colette would die for and dressed like, well a normal person. At least I thought
a sweatshirt and sweatpants were normal for a plane ride. Come on guys it’s
like fifteen hours in the same seat. No sane person would wear jeans on that.
What I liked
The end was pretty cool: though if
somebody could explain this ghosts powers to me that would be great. I mean one
minute it’s the usual hovering and making things fly around and the next thing
she was making somebody play an instrument against their will?
How? Still it
was decently interesting. Though doubt that a women who was torn away
from her husband and children and got her head chopped off would stop because of
an apology. No matter how heartfelt it was I’m not buying it.
I kind of want to go visit Paris
now: Though I can see some problems with you know not being able to speak a
word of French.
What I didn’t like
The people who got murdered: This
is going to take a bit of explaining including spoilers so be forewarned.
All the people getting decapitated
are part of a secret society who took blood oaths to protect Marie Antoinette.
I don’t think blood oaths were really a thing during the French revolution but
whatever.
Anyway these people allegedly sold out the Queen and her family in
order to save their own wife/husband/children etc. So now the Queen is back
from the grave and murdering the descendants of said secret society.
That’s all fine and good but the
worst part is that every single descendant was an utterly despicable human
being.
I don’t know if that’s because the author didn’t want the ghost offing
innocent people but it was just really hard to believe.
Colette
is portrayed as the only nice one of the bunch (I’ve already expressed my disagreement
with that statement enough) and it seems like it’s because her ancestor, the one
who betrayed the Queen, felt bad about it in the end?
Am I the only one who
felt like the book was unintentionally suggesting that your blood and your
ancestors determined who you were? Maybe I am who knows.
Colette: everybody knows why.
It was just really petty: For a
book with ‘serial killer’ in the title most of the narrative was taken up with
completely childish things.
Just the nonsensical fluff that populates at least forty percent of teen books
in the world. Even the big showdown between Colette and her ‘friends’
was a bit sparse and a tiny bit boring.
So in the end I’m glad I didn’t
come into this with to high expectations. There were some interesting parts, there
always are, but most of the time I was resisting the urge to skim pages and
rolling my eyes a lot. At least I can say that I’m not too disappointed but I’m
still unimpressed.
current verdict
Comments
Post a Comment